Philosophy, et cetera: Objections to Consequentialism Philosophy, et cetera: Objections to Consequentialism

Consequentialist considerations when dating, exploring ayn rand's revolutionary philosophy.

In case a positive reason is needed, consequentialists present a wide variety of arguments. Common moral intuition is thereby preserved. Rule consequentialism is a theory that is sometimes seen as an attempt to reconcile deontology and consequentialism—and in some cases, this is stated as a criticism of rule consequentialism.

Such details are discussed in another entry in this encyclopedia see Hooker on rule-consequentialism. The goodness of the intention then reflects the balance of the good and evil of these consequences, with no limits imposed upon it by the nature of the act itself—even if it be, say, the breaking of a promise or the execution of an innocent man.

People on this machine believe they are spending time with their friends, winning Olympic gold medals and Nobel prizes, having sex with their favorite lovers, or doing whatever gives them the greatest balance of pleasure over pain.

For and Against, by J.

How does consequentialist ethics define morality? What is consequentialism?

Ideal Code, Real World, Oxford: Cases like these lead some consequentialists to deny that moral rightness is any function of the values of particular effects of acts.

In one moment Jim goes from being a tourist in a foreign country to becoming a murderer for the sake of morality.

To the extent she can, she selects her instructors according to her best judgment of their teaching abilities. Rule consequentialism exists in the forms of rule utilitarianism and rule egoism. This position, which might be called proximate consequentialism, makes it much easier for agents and observers to justify moral judgments of acts because it obviates the meet girl gamers ukc to predict non-proximate consequences in distant times and places.

The most common indirect consequentialism is rule consequentialism, which makes the moral rightness of an act depend on the consequences of a rule. Some virtue ethicists hold that consequentialist theories totally disregard the development and importance of moral character.

Consequentialist moral theories that focus on actual or objectively probable consequences are often described as objective consequentialism Railton Being rational does not mean that an individual will be infallible. The criterion of a good stock investment is its total return, but the best decision procedure still might be to reduce risk by buying an index fund or blue-chip stocks.

What if someone fights nobly for a good cause, but fails in the end? Egalitarian critics of classical utilitarianism argue that the latter outcome is better, so more than the total amount of good matters.

Hence, most consequentialists do not mind giving up consequentialism as a direct decision procedure as long as consequences remain the criterion of rightness but see Chappell A possible inference is, that one can not be blamed for mistaken judgments if the motivation was to do good.

For example, it may be meaningful to speak of an action as being good for someone as an individual, but bad for them as a citizen of their town.

Consequentialism

Classic utilitarianism added up the values within each part of the consequences to determine which total set of consequences has the most value in it. Perhaps it can in some way be quantified, so that if carrying out some act would damage the integrity of the individual so grievously that the maximum utility could be reached only if they failed to act, then not acting would be the right thing to do.

Why should mistakes by other doctors in other cases make this doctor's act morally wrong, when this doctor knows for sure that he is not mistaken in this case? Every major aspect of his existence is dictated by the force of agents of the government.

Positive consequentialism demands that we bring about good states of affairs, whereas negative consequentialism may only require that we avoid bad ones. In contrast, an agent-relative approach requires observers to adopt the doctor's perspective in judging whether it would be morally wrong for the doctor to perform the transplant.

Agent-focused consequentialism, on the other hand, focuses on the particular needs of the moral agent.

Rational principles are not mere rules. Then they hold what can be called public acceptance rule consequentialism: In contrast, Haretries to derive his version of utilitarianism from substantively neutral accounts of morality, of moral language, and of rationality.

There is no other way to save any of the other five patients FootThomson ; compare related cases in Carritt and McCloskey Another indirect version is virtue consequentialism, which holds that whether an act is morally right depends on whether it stems from or expresses a state of character that maximizes good consequences and, hence, is a virtue.

That Job should suffer and Socrates and Jesus die while the wicked prosper, then seems unjust. Other contemporary forms of utilitarianism mirror the forms of consequentialism outlined below.

Search This Blog

She means that you cannot fake and hope to live fully as a human being. On the one hand the standard of right and wrong, on the other the chain of causes and effects, are fastened to their throne. Historically, hedonistic utilitarianism is the paradigmatic example of a consequentialist moral theory.

These points against hedonism are often supplemented with the story of the experience machine found in Nozick42—45; cf. By 'Consequentialism' I roughly mean the unconstrained pursuit of the good -- which might be agent-relative, but shouldn't build in intrinsic concern for traditional "side constraints" like promises, fairness, etc.

Even if qualitative hedonism is coherent and is a kind of hedonism, it still might not seem plausible.

Social Ethics/philosophy 226: Ch 12 (e&d) Considerations

One could, instead, aggregate goods for each individual but not aggregate goods of separate individuals Roberts Various theorists are split as to whether the rules are the only determinant of moral behavior or not.

Opponents of utilitarianism find this claim implausible, but it is not obvious that their counter-utilitarian intuitions are reliable or well-grounded Murphychs. If the former is better, then the action is morally right J.

Friday, July 25, Objections to Consequentialism What do you think are the strongest objections to Consequentialism? Rule consequentialism is a theory that is sometimes seen as an attempt to reconcile deontology and consequentialism—and in some cases, this is stated as a criticism of rule consequentialism.

Many people will not find this intuition as clear as in the other cases, but those who do find it immoral for the doctor to perform the transplant even in this case will want to modify consequentialism in some other way in order to yield the desired judgment.

So by the nature of his position, the dictator must surround himself with fellow power-lusters. Various theorists are split as to whether the rules are the only determinant of moral behavior or not. Roughly speaking, a consequentialist says that you should do certain things, because those actions produce good consequences.

Consequentialism - Wikipedia

Virtue ethicists today generally take this basic approach to ethics and make modifications. The indirectness of such rule utilitarianism provides a way to remain consequentialist and yet capture the common moral intuition that it is immoral to perform the transplant in the above situation.

Moderate deontologists, for example, often judge that it is morally wrong to kill one person to save five but not morally wrong to kill one person to save a million.

Moore and Hastings Rashdall tries to meet the difficulty by advocating a plurality of ends and including among them the attainment of virtue itself, which, as John Stuart Mill affirmed, "may be felt a good in itself, and desired as such with as great intensity as any other good".

The happiness of the individual is overridden by the happiness of the masses. Would it be better to improve the welfare of the acting agent or a bystander?

Virtue, Vice, and Value, New York: There are many different types of consequentialism that people can adopt.

A Utilitarian Approach

Anarchy, State, and Utopia, New York: Other consequentialists add the intrinsic values of friendship or love, freedom or ability, life, virtue, and so on. Anscombe objects to consequentialism on the grounds that it does not provide ethical guidance in what one ought to do because there is no distinction between consequences that are foreseen and those that are intended.

We can also see that wealth is not created by one individual at the expense of others. Reprinted in Railton As a result, it could be argued that there is a moral imperative for an agent to inform himself as much as possible about a situation before judging the appropriate course of action.

The dictator ends up faking in virtually every aspect of life.